Dandruff
Archaeologists add to the scientific and historical record by digging stuff up. While much of this diggery is concerned with neanderthal skulls and brontoceratops tailbones, etc, there has also been a wealth of knowledge extracted from the stuff that people threw away. Cooking pots, tools, weapons, and even old footwear have provided important clues as to how the ancients lived, and how events unfolded.
From more recent civilizations (Colorado gold rush miners, for example), the archaeological record has included things such as food tins, glassware, and the occasional bit of recovered writing paper. Even those items with little or no scientific value may be cherished by antique collectors and students of lost cultures.
Are we in danger of losing these valuable resources from the past? And if so, what is causing this depletion of buried historical artifacts?
The answer is "Yes!", my friends, and recycling is to blame.
Here is one possible future to contemplate: When our society collapses and civilization crumbles (also known as the "AlGorepalypse"), there will be no leftover physical remnants of our culture, because we will have recycled everything. Future historians will have plenty of bones to study (not to mention artificial hips and teflon arteries), but no bean cans, papers, or 2-liter Pepsi bottles to provide the context for understanding our culture. They'll probably think we were some sort of hybrid cyborg creatures who lived in a world without literature, portable food storage, or carbonated beverages.
We must stop this madness now, my friends, or future generations will be clueless, and our legacies lost for eternity. Can anyone truly understand our world without access to our junk mail and cereal boxes? I think not.
For the more immediate future, though, my concerns are of a smaller scale. I heard on the news the other day that some cities have passed laws prohibiting BOTH paper and plastic bags from being used to transport groceries. While I can't quote you the exact paragraph, I'm pretty sure that the US Constitution clearly grants Congress the power to force people to buy certain products; so I'm sure no elected representatives will lose their jobs over this. But it seems to me that both paper and plastic bags still have some utility that "reusable" cloth bags just don't possess. It's a shame to lose this.
In the aerospace industry, there's a concept called a "trade study", where the engineers look at the consequences of an action before they take it. For example, if you want more power on your spacecraft, it's going to make the vehicle heavier. If you want it to last longer, you have to spend money for higher quality components, etc. In other words, there is ALWAYS a cost for any "improvement"...and a wise decision maker will try to completely understand those costs before ordering the change. I kinda wish our lawmakers were familiar with this concept.
I also fear that we're losing touch with some of our cherished cultural icons. For example, will our new laws make it illegal to use the incandescent bulb as a symbol for a great idea? Will "sliced bread" be outlawed because the crumbs created by the slicing process can't be recycled into fresh new loaves? Will our children's macaroni artwork be yanked from the fridge door and be recycled into dinner? These questions keep me awake at night.
Anyway, I kinda got off the subject, which was about how familiar things are disappearing. Just as there are no more dial telephones, cranks for car windows, or Sambo's Restaurants, there have also been subtle changes in the world of personal hygiene and fashion. When I was a kid, it was not unusual at all to see people with dandruff flakes on their shoulders, or people with big wet areas in the armpits of their shirts. Gold teeth, cufflinks, clip-on neckties, and puffy shellacked hairdos that could withstand hurricane-force winds -- these could be seen in public every day of the week. But they have all disappeared.
Some of these disappearances were driven by technology and some were driven by common sense. Aluminum chlorohydrate took care of the pits, and the eradication of the hippie plague took care of the bouffants. But my question is this: What happened to dandruff? At one time, it was a common ailment with only one cure: Head and Shoulders. So what happened? Did the other shampoos eventually adopt whatever secret ingredient kept the scalp from flaking? Or did global warming cause human skin adaptation for additional moisture retention? Or was it the fluoride the commies put in our water? Or adoption of daily showers, whereas the Fonzie generation bathed only once a week? I don't know.
If you have the answer, please let me know. Otherwise, you might want to start burying some of your trash rather than putting it in the recycle bin -- for the sake of your grandchildren. We MUST think of the children!
Thanks, and have a great day!